PETROGRAPHY OF THE TRENTON AND BLACK RIVER GROUP CARBONATE ROCKS IN THE APPALACHIAN BASIN
DIAGENESIS
The term diagenesis refers to all of the processes that affect
sediment from just after deposition up to the lowest grade of metamorphism,
the greenschist facies (Pettijohn and others, 1987). It is the sum of physical,
chemical, and biochemical changes occurring in a sedimentary deposit after
its initial accumulation, excluding metamorphism (Friedman and Saunders, 1978).
Diagenesis in the rocks of the Trenton and Black River Groups included seven
major processes: 1) microbial micritization; 2) cementation; 3) neomorphism;
4) replacement; 5) physical and chemical compaction; 6) dissolution; and 7)
dolomitization (see, Tucker and Wright, 1990, p.314). Dolomitization is the
most important diagenetic aspect of the Trenton and Black River petroleum
reservoirs and is discussed separately in the next section of this report.
Note: The term diagenesis is used differently by
organic geochemists, and we employ their usage in the petroleum geochemistry
reports of this research. In petroleum geochemistry, diagenesis is the process
involving the biological, physical, and chemical alteration of the organic
debris in sediments without a pronounced effect from rising temperature (Hunt,
1996). It covers the range of temperature up to about 50°C (122°F).
Readers should bear these different usages in mind when reading this report.
Microbial Micritization
Partial to complete microbial micritization of skeletal grains,
ooids, and probable pellets occurs in most carbonate rock types in the Trenton
and Black River Groups throughout the Appalachian basin. Microbial micritization
is most evident in bioclastic grainstones and packstones where micrite envelops
developed on skeletal grains, and in some mixed oolitic/peloidal grainstones
and packstones where the peloids show compelling evidence of carbonate grain
degradation and replacement with micrite. In both cases, the micritization
process may have been mediated by endolithic algae, fungi, or bacteria and
associated biochemical or physiochemical processes.
The micrite envelops shown in
Appendix
II (Micritization Examples
#1 - 4) formed around many of the bioclasts in mixed-fossil grainstones. These
envelopes are essentially identical to those shown and discussed by Milliman
(1974), Bathurst (1975), Tucker and Wright (1990), and Scholle and Ulmer-Scholle
(2003). Bathurst (1975, p.381 - 389) suggested such envelopes formed through
the filling of altered grains rather than precipitation of a new rind around
the grain: algae, fungi, or bacteria bore into the grain, die, and the subsequent
alteration of the organic material provides a chemical environment conducive
to calcium carbonate precipitation, thus filling the voids.
Intense activity by endolithic microbes can lead to complete
micritization of carbonate grains. This was relatively common during deposition
of both Trenton and Black River carbonates. (
Figure
5) shows wholly micritized ooids in the Black River Formation in the subsurface
of western New York.
The micrite envelope surrounding the echinoid fragment in Figure
6 originated in the same way as those shown
Appendix
II, i.e., through marine
cementation within spaces created by endolithic boring organisms. The micrite
cement shown in Figure 6, however, displays a distinctive clotted or peloidal
texture Figure (
6b
and
6c).
Higher magnification (
Figure
6c) reveals that the "clots" of microcrystalline calcite in the micrite
rind consist of unimodal, decimicron-size spherical clusters composed of even
smaller (micron- and sub micron-size) calcite crystals. Each clot or peloid
consists of a brownish, cloudy nucleus and a rim of clear, well-developed
euhedral crystals. These clots grade into adjacent patches of coarser, centimicron-size
microcrystalline matrix with an identical peloidal fabric or into coarser
calcite spar cement. These micrite envelopes and contiguous patches of clotted
microcrystalline calcite may be bacterially induced calcite precipitates,
or strictly abiotic cement (Lighty, 1985; Macintyre, 1985; Chafetz, 1986;
Tucker and Wright, 1990; Scholle and Ulmer-Scholle, 2003; Bosak and others,
2004).
Cementation
The precipitation of calcium carbonate cements in the Trenton
and Black River limestones was a major diagenetic process during and shortly
after deposition on the sea floor in Ordovician time. Burial cementation also
affected the rocks. The principal calcite cements in the rocks are 1) peloidal
calcite, 2) prismatic fibrous to bladed calcite rinds on allochems, 3) meniscus
calcite cement, 4) syntaxial calcite overgrowths, and 5) calcite spar. Dolomite
cements are important, but we discuss these later in the section on dolomite
textures. Several late-stage non-carbonate cements are associated with dolomite
cements and we discuss these in the section on dolomitization.
Peloidal Cements
While microbial micrite envelopes around allochems and micrite
replacement of grains are common in the Trenton and Black River carbonates
of the Appalachian basin, most of the microcrystalline calcite, microspar,
and pseudospar in these rocks occur as matrix in packstones, wackestones,
and mudstones. As discussed above, much of this matrix originally formed in
situ as carbonate mud derived from the breakdown of organisms, and it now
exists in the rocks as neomorphic, recrystallized calcite. A great deal of
the carbonate matrix in all of the limestone types, however, also formed in
situ as peloidal cement. The clotted fabric of peloidal cement is ubiquitous
in the Trenton and Black River limestones, and can usually be discerned even
through most dolomite fabrics.
Figure 7 shows core and thin section photographs of Black River
Formation limestone recovered in the Gray #1 well core, Steuben County, NY.
Figure
7a shows the macroscopic appearance of this limestone - a seeming medium
gray, bioturbated and burrowed sparse biomicrite (Folk, 1962) or wackestone
(Dunham, 1962). There are problems with using the Dunham (1962) classification
for this sample (see discussion below) so we prefer the Folk (1962) name.
Dissolution structures (solution seams) indicate moderate chemical compaction.
Thin section examination of this sample reveals that skeletal
grains comprise about 20 percent of the limestone, and include crinoids, bryozoans,
brachiopods, trilobites, alga, and gastropods (
Figure
7b). Most allochems were altered by neomorphism, specifically recrystallization
and degrading recrystallization. Authigenic pyrite, quartz, feldspar, and
anhydrite along with dolomite make up about 5.5 percent of the rock. About
75 percent of this limestone, however, consists of decimicron-size peloids
that could be interpreted as either framework grains or cement (Scholle and
Ulmer-Scholle, 2003;
Figure
7b). If framework grains, then the peloids might have originated as 1)
algal material, 2) detritial sediment, 3) pellets, or 4) a replacement of
other framework grains (Tucker and Wright, 1990, p.321 and references therein).
If the peloids are cement then they are
in situ precipitates.
Careful examination of the peloids at higher magnifications
(Figure
7c
and
7d)
reveals that they most probably are cement and not carbonate grains. Individual
peloids are 50 to 100 μm in diameter and consist of 1) a dark brown nucleus
composed of micron-size calcite surrounded by 2) a rim of euhedral, dentate
to blocky microspar. The average crystal size of the later is ~25μm. The
highest magnification view (
Figure
7d) shows the nuclei consist of clots of submicron-size opaque material;
this material might be organic, possibly microbial matter (Chafetz, 1986)
or simply submicrocrystalline, radial, acicular calcite crystals that grew
around a small number of nuclei (Bosak and others, 2004). If the nuclei are
organic, the peloids likely originated as
in situ precipitates around
clumps of bacteria and the microspar likely is a neomorphic recrystallization
product of earlier micrite matrix (Lighty, 1985; Macintyre, 1985; Chafetz,
1986; Tucker and Wright, 1990). If the nuclei are inorganic, the opaque appearance
of the peloids probably is a consequence of the small crystal grain size relative
to the thickness of the thin section (Bosak and others, 2004). In this case,
the peloidal nuclei are strictly abiotic in origin and formed as calcite cement
from suspension and geopetal settling (Bosak and others, 2004).
The peloidal fabric in this limestone occurs as: 1) dominant
groundmass or "matrix" (Figure
7a,
7b,
7c,
7d);
2) as an internal cement within the zooecia of bryozoan skeletal grains and
the lumens of crinoid fragments (
Figure
7e); 3) as cement filling fabric-selective pores, i.e., intraparticle
voids (
Figure
7f); and 4) as mimic replacement of bryozoan grains (
Figure
7g).
All of the characteristics of the peloids - their uniform crystal
size, restricted size range, consistent texture, monomineralogy, opaque nuclei,
and euhedral outer rims- suggest that they are in situ precipitates which
formed through cementation on or just below the sea floor (Tucker and Wright,
1990; Malone and others, 2001; Bosak and others, 2004. This peloidal fabric
characterizes most of the fine-grained rocks in the Trenton and Black River
carbonates that we examined.
The most compelling evidence for interpreting these peloidal
textures as marine cement is the fact that this fabric is ubiquitous in Trenton
and Black River Group hardgrounds throughout the basin (Figure 8). Hardgrounds
are synsedimentarily lithified carbonate seafloors that become hardened in
situ by the precipitation of carbonate cement in the primary pore space (Wilson
and Palmer, 1992, p.3). They are sedimentary horizons in marine carbonates
that exhibit evidence of exposure on the sea floor as lithified rock. Detailed
discussions of hardgrounds in the Trenton and Black River rocks of the Appalachian
basin can be found in Brett and Brookfield (1984) and Laughrey and others
(2003). All of the fine-grained or finely crystalline hardground lithologies
that we examined petrographically have a peloidal fabric.
A note on classification: The Dunham (1962) classification
of the sample shown in Figure 7 as a wackestone based on hand sample
description or a mixed-fossil/peloidal grainstone based on thin
section description is wrong because the fine calcite crystal size and peloidal
fabric do not reflect the limestone's depositional texture. The Folk (1962)
classification sparse biopelmicrite provides a better name for
the rock, although one might argue for sparse biopelsparite instead
(see Scholle and Ulmer-Scholle, 2003, p.266 - 271). We prefer the former
Folk (1962) name because the peloidal nuclei volumetrically dominate the
rock and their micron-size calcite crystals can be properly called micrite
(see Scholle and Ulmer-Scholle, 2003, p. 266). An alternate name, from the
classification scheme of Wright (1992) is cementstone.
Other Calcite Cements
In addition to the peloidal calcite cements just discussed,
calcite cement also occurs as prismatic fibrous to bladed rinds, meniscus-type
cement, syntaxial overgrowths on allochems, poikilotopic calcite spar, and
void-filling spar. We interpret these various calcite cements as products
of both marine and burial diagenesis.
Prismatic fibrous to bladed rinds of calcite are common on all
allochems we observed in the Trenton and Black River limestones. These crystals
may grow directly on the allochems, or atop micrite envelopes. Good examples
are shown
Appendix
II (Prismatic fringe examples 1 - 3). These morphologies are typical of
modern high-Mg calcite and aragonite cements (Scholle and Ulmer-Scholle, 2003),
but probably precipitated as calcite in the Ordovician sea (Lowenstein and
others, 2001).
We observed unique
meniscus-type cement (Hillgartner
and others, 2001) in oolitic grainstones of the Black River Formation at Union
Furnace, Pennsylvania (
Appendix
I, nonskeletal grains, ooid example #5). Meniscus cements usually are
cited as evidence for meteoric diagenesis in the vadose zone (James and Choquette,
1984; Scholle and Ulmer-Scholle, 2003), but Hillgartner and others (2001)
demonstrated a marine diagenetic origin for microbially-induced meniscus cements
in carbonate sands of the Bahamas and Mesozoic platform carbonates of the
Swiss and French Jura Mountains. These authors cautioned that an interpretation
of early vadose diagenesis should not be based on meniscus cement alone. They
suggested the term
meniscus-type cement for these unique marine cements
that form in association with the calcification of microbial filaments and
the trapping of percolating micrite in subtidal settings. The
meniscus-type
cements in the Black River oolitic grainstones occur along with grapestone,
oolitic intraclasts, micritized grains, bladed calcite rinds, and hardgrounds
all suggesting sea floor lithification.
Syntaxial calcite overgrowths are common on echinoid fragments
in the Trenton and Black River rocks of the Appalachian basin (
Appendix
II, Syntaxial Overgrowths Examples #1 and #2). Such cements are reported
from meteoric, marine, and burial diagenetic environments (Scholle and Ulmer-Scholle,
2003), ands require careful geochemical and petrographic arguments in order
to be diagnostic (Tucker and Wright, 1990). We interpret the syntaxial overgrowths
in the Trenton and Black River Formations as products of marine and/or burial
diagenesis because of their association with other marine cements in the rocks
and the lack of any evidence for exposure to the meteoric environment (i.e.,
lack of grain dissolution and no evidence whatsoever of karst processes).
Poikilotopic spar is likewise common (
Appendix
II, Poikilotopic spar Examples 1#1 and #2) and we interpret it to be of
marine and/or burial diagenetic origin too.
Drusy mosaics of calcite spar fill most primary pore space in
the Trenton and Black River Formations in the Appalachian basin (
Appendix
II, Equant Calcite Spar Examples #1 and #2, Drusy Spar Examples #1 and
#2). The precipitation of this calcite spar followed chemical compaction of
the limestones (
Appendix
II, Compaction Examples #5 and #6) indicating that these are clearly burial
diagenetic environment cements (Wright and Tucker, 1990, p.352). Additional
observations supporting this conclusion include broken and collapsed micrite
envelopes within the spar and fractured grains cemented by the spar.
Neomorphism
A number of neomorphic fabrics occur in the Trenton and Black
River rocks of the Appalachian Basin (
Appendix
II). Microspar and pseudospar commonly replace micrite in muddy carbonate
rocks. Most of this is aggrading neomorphism (
Appendix
II, Neomorphism examples #1 - #3). Microspar and pseudospar also commonly
replace allochems (see Appendix I, Coral Example #2 and #3).
Replacement
Numerous noncarbonate minerals replace both limestone and dolomite
in the Trenton and Black River Formations. These include chert, chalcedony
and quartz, feldspar, iron sulfides and oxides, sphalerite, fluorite, phosphate,
sulfates, and chlorides. Some examples follow.
Chert and chalcedony replace both limestone and dolomite in
the Trenton and Black River rocks throughout the Appalachian basin.
Appendix
II (Silicification Examples 31 - #4) and Figure 9 show examples of this
replacement. Chalcedony that replaces hydrothermal dolomite is length-slow
(Figure 9), possibly implying that the replacement took place in a sulfate-rich
aqueous environment (Folk and Pittman, 1971; Scholle and Ulmer-Scholle, 2003).
Compaction (including pressure solution)
Compaction fabrics in the Trenton and Black River Formations
are widespread throughout the basin. They include mechanical compaction features
such as plastic deformation of soft grains and brittle fractures in grains,
and chemical compaction features such as cocavo-convex and sutured contacts
between grains, dissolution seams, and stylolites. Examples of these are provided
in
Appendix
II.
Dissolution
There is very little evidence for dissolution features in the
limestones of the Trenton and Black River Formations in the basin. This is
consistent with what is known of the Ordovician carbonate systems on a global
scale (Markello and others, 2005), and with recent work on the local scale
by Harris (2005) and Smith and others (2005). Limestone dissolution adequate
for creating commercial reservoirs is restricted to processes associated with
dolomitization adjacent to fractures. These are discussed below.
to top